The INCREDIBLE increase in death rates among jabbed in UK

Note: I just translated this post, originally posted in February, 2023, to make it available to non-italian readers).

This is one of those cases where I wish I could say I was wrong (and maybe I am: is there a mathematician who can prove me wrong? I’d be happy to!)..

Why?

Because if in 2021, analyzing data from the English ONS (Office for National Statistics), at the beginning of the “vaccination” campaign, I found a death rate TRIPLE among double-serotyped horses compared to thoroughbreds,

today,

as the number of doses has increased and time has passed,

that ratio has become FIFTEEN TO ONE:

if the math is correct, the death rate among triple-serotyped horses is 15 TIMES that of thoroughbreds.

Please tell me I’m wrong.

-oOo-

(For Excel enthusiasts who want to prove me wrong—I’d be happy to—here’s the file I worked on: DatiONS_2022_UK_Morti15X referencetableONSUK

or the link to the ONS page:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

or to Eurostat:

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/DDN-20230217-1)

Update February 26, 2023

I tried a different approach, which follows these steps:

• by month;
• I only take the 2022 data;
• I calculate the death totals for each individual cluster;
• and the averages of members of each cluster;
• so as to obtain the probability of death for each cluster;
• for the unvaccinated, this value is that;
• for the others, I calculate the total number of deaths divided by the total number of members of the cluster;

The final result is:

the ratio between the average death rate in the various vaccinated groups and that of the unvaccinated is 2.

This value, still sufficient to criminalize health ministers, the WHO, Fauci, etc., is however lower than the 15 represented in the video. Why?

Because this estimate also includes those who stopped at the first and second doses, while the 15 to 1 ratio concerns those who reached the booster dose..

I am increasingly convinced that these numbers are sufficient for a new Nuremberg trial.

Added June 1, 2023

In Italy, however, it is impossible to know whether a death was vaccinated or not. Welcome to the new dictatorship.

Added June 28, 2023

Following the publication of this information on Massimo Mazzucco’s website (luogocomune.net), some criticisms arose, two in particular to which I felt the need to respond:

• The reported data contained a “double digit“: the “ever vaccinated” classification (vaccinated at least once) was not a set to be added to the others, but rather an additional classification; I wasn’t sure why;
• Some raised the issue of age: by (erroneously) assuming that the elderly (who notoriously have a much higher death rate) were vaccinated much more, it was clear that an overall analysis, not divided by age group, could be misleading;

So I took the ONS file (by the way, they also changed some things; it’s clear they’d found some errors or imperfections) and re-did the analysis, this time by age group.

In the screenshot below, a summary view shows that there is no significant distinction between different age groups:

1. 1. • The vaccine has harmed everyone.
      • For those who have reached the third dose, mortality rates are on average 3 to 5 times those of those who have not been vaccinated.

(Note: gray lines: non-significant values; evidently, widespread effects have not yet been seen in the first 21 days after the injection.)

If, instead of using the survival rate method, I had simply added the percentages, I would have obtained incorrect results (although similar due to the low percentages):

referencetablefeb213

Aggiunta del 27 Ottobre 2024

Anche in Giapone se ne sono accorti